WASHINGTON (AP) — Health care coverage for newly legalized immigrants is emerging as a thorny issue in Congress’ drive to remake the nation’s immigration system, posing hard-to-solve problems for Senate negotiators and threatening a bill-writing effort in the House.
The question is how much access to taxpayer-subsidized care should be granted to immigrants who were here illegally and are embarking on a path to citizenship. Answering it has pulled the noxious politics around President Barack Obama’s signature health care law into the immigration debate.
That’s threatening fragile alliances between Republicans and Democrats, already causing one key House member, GOP Rep. Raul Labrador of Idaho, to ditch a bipartisan group in the House that has been struggling to finalize a comprehensive immigration bill.
“What may be the story at the end of this session is that Obamacare killed immigration reform,” Labrador said before a last-gasp effort failed this week to resolve the health care dispute in a way he could accept. Now the seven other members of the House group are moving forward without Labrador, who said their proposal doesn’t go far enough to ensure that immigrants must pay for all their own health care costs without leaving taxpayers on the hook for any of it.
Health care and immigrants was a hot-button issue even before Republican Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina yelled “You lie!” at Obama four years ago as the president told Congress that immigrants in the country illegally wouldn’t be covered under his health plan. For Republicans, allowing immigrants here illegally to get coverage under Obamacare remains a nonstarter, even once they’ve taken the first steps toward legalizing their status.
“We cannot be providing Obamacare subsidies to people who have been violating our immigration laws,” said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., an author of a bipartisan immigration bill that the full Senate began debating Friday.
The Senate bill bars immigrants in a new provisional legal status, the first step toward a green card and citizenship, from getting taxpayer-subsidized care. That includes Medicaid and tax subsidies to buy coverage in the new state purchasing exchanges being set up by Obamacare. The immigrants would be in provisional status for 10 years, and only once they get a permanent resident green card would they be able to access Obamacare subsidies.
The approach is opposed by immigrant advocates who pushed for provisional legal immigrants to be allowed government-subsidized care, arguing that it makes sense for public health and the economy. But the idea was opposed by Republicans, and even Democratic authors of the Senate bill didn’t fight too hard for it, advocates said, partly because it would have greatly increased the cost of the legislation.
“We definitely were pushing from the start, and basically we tried to remind the Democrats that this was sort of an unfulfilled promise from the Affordable Care Act, when undocumented immigrants were excluded,” said Sonal Ambegaokar, health policy attorney at the National Immigration Law Center. She said some Democrats were open to the arguments but that it quickly became clear they wouldn’t prevail, “for political reasons, and not economic reasons.”
As the House immigration group moves forward trying to unveil a bill, one possibility is to include placeholder language on health coverage similar to what’s in the Senate measure.
So where does that leave newly legalized immigrants in provisional status with no access to publicly funded care?
In the aftermath of Wilson’s outburst, the White House tightened its stance on the Affordable Care Act, saying that immigrants here illegally wouldn’t be able to buy coverage in new health care exchanges even using their own money. But the Senate immigration bill does allow them to go into the exchanges with their own money once they obtain provisional legal status. For most, that would be prohibitively expensive.
Although current law bars immigrants here illegally from Medicaid and Obamacare, pregnant women, children, seniors and the disabled have access to emergency Medicaid services. Immigrants here illegally can also access community health centers. That would be the case for immigrants getting provisional status under the immigration bill, too.
Beyond that, a certain number of immigrants would get employer-sponsored care. Right now, some 30 percent of immigrants here illegally are covered that way, according to the Migration Policy Institute. That number would likely rise at least somewhat if the immigration bill becomes law.
But the issues are far from settled. Along with border security and other matters, health coverage is almost certain to be the subject of disputes on the Senate floor in the weeks ahead.
As debate on the legislation opened Friday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., argued that the bill offers “commonsense reforms which will make our country safer and help undocumented immigrants get right with the law.”
A leading opponent, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., claimed the bill offers a false promise of enforcing immigration laws and securing the border.
“It will definitely give amnesty today, it will definitely give immediate legal status to some 11 million people today,” Sessions said. But the promise of enforcement “is not fulfilled.”
Friday was given over to debate, and the first votes, on moving the bill forward, will come Tuesday. Reid said he wants to finish the legislation by July 4.
A health care amendment of particular concern to advocates is expected to be offered by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. It would bar immigrants from getting Obamacare subsidies for five years after they’ve gotten green cards. Hatch notes that a five-year prohibition on subsidies for new green card holders exists in current law with respect to Medicaid and other programs. Democratic authors of the bill oppose Hatch’s amendment but want to find some way to accommodate that and other changes he’s proposing in order to get his vote.
Senators are confronting another complication created by their attempt to block immigrants from getting Obamacare subsidies in the exchanges. Employers with 50 or more workers face penalties if they don’t offer adequate health coverage to their workers, but some of those penalties depend on how many workers end up shopping in the exchanges with federal subsidies.
Since provisional immigrants don’t have the right to get federal subsidies, it appears employers in some cases could face no penalty for failing to insure them, potentially giving employers an incentive to hire newly legalized immigrants over American citizens.
It’s a problem senators say they want to work out on the Senate floor, but the solution is not clear.