Kansas anti-discrimination bill seeks to protect to LGBT

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas legislation that would add sexual orientation and gender identity to the state’s anti-discrimination statute is drawing opposition, with critics worried the measure could lead to more lawsuits.

The measure, which was the subject of a legislative hearing Thursday, would make it illegal to fire or evict someone for being gay or transgender, and ensure equal access to public accommodation, the Wichita Eagle reported.

Supporters of the bill consider it necessary because the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community in Kansas routinely faces discrimination. Opponents say the measure would make Kansas residents who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds vulnerable to lawsuits and that transgender women would be allowed to enter women’s bathrooms.

Current law shields Kansas residents from discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations based on race, religion, color, sex, disability, family status, national origin or ancestry.

The new legislation specifically states that public accommodation shall not refer to religious organizations, the measure’s sponsor, Democratic Rep. John Carmichael of Wichita, said after Thursday’s hearing.

Sandra Meade, a Navy veteran and transgender woman who heads the LGBT rights group Equality Kansas, warned during the hearing that opponents would use fear of predators in bathrooms to kill the bill and asked them to “reject that demagoguery on its face.”

“Coming out is risky,” Meade said. “And it’s risky in a conservative environment because of the amount of demagoguery that’s going on.”

Meade added that requiring transgender women to use men’s bathrooms puts them at risk.

But Kellie Fiedorek, an attorney with the Alliance Defending Freedom, a national group focused on religious freedom issues, insisted “these laws restrict everyone’s freedom.”

She cited the potential financial consequences of a Washington florist being sued under that state’s anti-discrimination law for refusing to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding.

“And if she loses her case, she will not only lose her business, but she will lose her entire life savings, her home. She will lose everything because of a law like this,” Fiedorek said.

Rep. John Whitmer, R-Wichita, said he worried that the legislation would “take rights from one group of people and bestow them to another.”

 

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s